diff --git a/tutorials/key_differences_between_python_2_and_3.ipynb b/tutorials/key_differences_between_python_2_and_3.ipynb
index 22a8f86..ac07efa 100644
--- a/tutorials/key_differences_between_python_2_and_3.ipynb
+++ b/tutorials/key_differences_between_python_2_and_3.ipynb
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
  "metadata": {
   "name": "",
-  "signature": "sha256:2d8d614150aba437b28f7fe22d2e6a05b76ddb1a447d645c7d5085ab0c286c44"
+  "signature": "sha256:3442b8345ce99d8d379e475a753f23abf3392c6d4a6fdf185cf061e73e09b9e1"
  },
  "nbformat": 3,
  "nbformat_minor": 0,
@@ -151,13 +151,13 @@
       "<tr><td>generators</td>\n",
       "<td>2.2.0a1</td>\n",
       "<td>2.3</td>\n",
-      "<td><a class=\"pep reference external\" href=\"http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0255\"><strong>PEP 255</strong></a>:\n",
+      "<td><a href=\"http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0255\"><strong>PEP 255</strong></a>:\n",
       "<em>Simple Generators</em></td>\n",
       "</tr>\n",
       "<tr><td>division</td>\n",
       "<td>2.2.0a2</td>\n",
       "<td>3.0</td>\n",
-      "<td><<a class=\"pep reference external\" href=\"http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0238\"><strong>PEP 238</strong></a>:\n",
+      "<td><a href=\"http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0238\"><strong>PEP 238</strong></a>:\n",
       "<em>Changing the Division Operator</em></td>\n",
       "</tr>\n",
       "<tr><td>absolute_import</td>\n",
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@
      "language": "python",
      "metadata": {},
      "outputs": [],
-     "prompt_number": 3
+     "prompt_number": 1
     },
     {
      "cell_type": "markdown",
@@ -227,10 +227,9 @@
      "cell_type": "markdown",
      "metadata": {},
      "source": [
-      "Very trivial, and the change in the print-syntax is probably the most widely known change, but still it is worth mentioning: Python 2's print function doesn't require the parantheses for invoking the print function (it wouldn't choke on them).  \n",
-      "In contrast, Python 3 would raise a `SyntaxError` if we called the print function the Python 2-way without the parentheses.  \n",
+      "Very trivial, and the change in the print-syntax is probably the most widely known change, but still it is worth mentioning: Python 2's print statement has been replaced by the `print()` function, meaning that we have to wrap the object that we want to print in parantheses. \n",
       "\n",
-      "I think this change in Python 3 makes sense in terms of consistency, since it is the common way in Python to invoke function calls with its parentheses."
+      "Python 2 doesn't have a problem with additional parantheses, but in contrast, Python 3 would raise a `SyntaxError` if we called the print function the Python 2-way without the parentheses.  \n"
      ]
     },
     {
@@ -324,6 +323,38 @@
      ],
      "prompt_number": 3
     },
+    {
+     "cell_type": "markdown",
+     "metadata": {},
+     "source": [
+      "**Note:**\n",
+      "\n",
+      "Printing \"Hello, World\" above  via Python 2 looked quite \"normal\". However, if we have multiple objects inside the parantheses, we will create a tuple, since `print` is a \"statement\" in Python 2, not a function call."
+     ]
+    },
+    {
+     "cell_type": "code",
+     "collapsed": false,
+     "input": [
+      "print 'Python', python_version()\n",
+      "print('a', 'b')\n",
+      "print 'a', 'b'"
+     ],
+     "language": "python",
+     "metadata": {},
+     "outputs": [
+      {
+       "output_type": "stream",
+       "stream": "stdout",
+       "text": [
+        "Python 2.7.6\n",
+        "('a', 'b')\n",
+        "a b\n"
+       ]
+      }
+     ],
+     "prompt_number": 4
+    },
     {
      "cell_type": "markdown",
      "metadata": {},